1) Does the summary meet the basic requirements of summary writing listed in the Rules for summary guide? If so, list a specific reason why this is a strong summary. If not, list why this summary could benefit from revision.
This writing meets most of the requirements that regulate the proper way of a summary composition. Both the title and authors are mentioned in the first sentence. The main idea is presented very clearly and concisely in the beginning of the summary. All authors’ quotations are used in a sensible way, whereas the paraphrasing is seamlessly integrated into the rest of the text. The specific example that involves a Christian employee is unfolded without any distortions and generalization attempts. All ideas are presented objectively and impartially, using the third person and present tense. The only minor flaw is the absence of the explicit author’s tags in the text. However, the summary refers to the authors in a number of other ways that make the authors’ tags unnecessary.
2) Do you agree that this is an academic argument? Why, or why not? If so, is it compelling enough for you to want to write about? Why, or why not?
There is no doubt about this writing being an academic argument. The tolerance issue is explored in depth, starting from the historic perspective on the tolerance perception. Further on, the neo-classical approach is explained with all changes to the initial doctrine. In order to emphasize the importance of the tolerance concept in a modern world, the summary touches some practices that are put in place in educational institutions and commercial companies. There is nothing perfunctory in the text, as all points are well elaborated on and the whole summary is developed logically and integrally. The counterarguments are present as well, limiting the extent to which the tolerance can be spread. Based on these counterarguments, the summary eventually introduces the authentic tolerance concept at the very end, when the reader has a sufficient background and is ready to apprehend the concept. Overall, the summary invites to read the whole work it refers to. The topic is worthy of an additional investigation and the summary definitely encourages the reader to pursue the subject further.