Jan 25, 2018 in Economics

Understanding the Difference of Operations

The achievements of an organization are the results of the combined effort of each individual”, according to Vince Lombardi, the role that each individual takes in connection with the most important issues that their organizations are involved with compels a great role on how the whole group fares when it comes to the need of being able to develop further towards progress in the industry or the group of organizational types that they belong to. Yes, each individual’s accountability to the role of the organization in the community is an important factor of consideration that every organizational member should practically give attention to.

Issues on how organizations are mandated and managed according to the role that they are taking in the community has naturally made it harder for a lot of groups today to formulate operations that are sure to reach the standards that have been set for them to follow. Considerably though, organizational administrators were able to find ways and practical solutions that could better their operations and provide them the chance to properly consider the role that they are taking (Mulgan 2000, 555). Believably, these situations mandate not only the strength and the capability of the administrational body of the organization to lead or to manage the process, but also insist on the cooperation that every member of the group takes as their own personal responsibility. Certainly, both for-profit and nonprofit organizations face this ethical responsibility of providing their group a management that works and giving the community that right quality of services and products that they deserve.

Different business organizations are based upon different foundations of mission and vision

Practically, every business organization needs to have a reason for existence. No matter what that reason is, it serves as the organization’s identification as it operates within the community that it aims to serve. Surely, this identification gives a proper sense of purpose as per suggested by the kind of organization that they are. Practically, the consideration on what particular kind of organization a group of people is practically committed to indicate the right kind of role that they are taking in the community. (Sinclair, 1995, 220)

As for example, the for-profit organizations are based upon the aim of gaining the attention of the communities to be able to generate financial gains. On the other hand, non-profit groups provide service and volunteer operations that are dedicated to making it easier for the communities to get by (Dubnick, 1998, 68). Surely, it should not be pointed out that for-profit organizations are all for themselves, meaning they exist for personal reasons of gaining profit, instead, they just provide service or products to the community in an aim of getting the right kind of exchange for what they provide the community with.

It could not be denied though that these organizations, whether for profit or nonprofit groups are accountable for their operations in connection with the process by which these operations are affecting the communities that they are living with. Basically, it could be noted that somehow, internal and external accountability of these organizations directly affect the kind of development that the said organizations are able to take in connection with the process by which they are able to relate to the needs and demands of the people within the communities that they are serving.

Within the discussion that follows, an understanding of what internal and external accountability is all about and how profit and nonprofit organizations respond to this matter shall be presented. Seriously, it could be noticed that there are reasons by which organizations exist and this existence is based on noting the fact that the organization is aiming to operate for a reason. First to know is that of the difference of operations that for-profit organizations have in comparison with that of the nonprofit organizations which shall be discussed in the phase of presentation that follows.

Understanding the Difference of Operations

As mentioned earlier, for profit organizations are based on the idea of gaining more returns for the services or products that they release for public appreciation. This is the reason why for-profit organizations are also known as business organizations. It is through this identification of organizational process that the indication of organizational role is further assured. Basically, for profit organizations intend to balance loses or expenses that they have utilized for the manufacturing of products or processing services with the amount of income that they are to receive from the market. It is through this balancing process that they are able to receive back what they have lost and have ample amount of money to fund further operations in the future to have the organization continuously existing within the society. (Mulgan, 2000, 556)

Besides this fact, for-profit organizations are also expected to face different measures of competition against other business groups that operate within the same industry as they do. Practically, it could then be realized that these organizations have to deal with more complicated approaches to operation just to be able to win the struggle of surviving in the field of modern commercial connections worldwide (Dykstra, 1939, 25). An example of this kind of organization is that of the IBM Company which basically have competition with Apple Computers and Compaq which are all international computer expert business operators that intend to offer the society with the best kinds of technological gadgets that are designed to make their life much easier and much enjoyable to live with.

On the other hand, nonprofit organizations such as the Red Cross International Community of Volunteers rely on contributions and donations from supporters all around the globe. Unlike for profit organizations, these groups do not have a fixed capital that funds their organization for continuously operating for the good of the society that expects their help and assistance in times of emergency. Organizations such as Red Cross do not go through the complicated process of competing with other organizations that are in the same field of volunteering service operation. For example, at times, when there are huge situations such as wars and civil movements that affect the majority of the population of people in one country, Red Cross sends in some of its representatives to be able to deal with the situation and create a good sense out of the resources that they are able to use to give proper attention to the needs of the people needing their attention (Schedler, 1999, 332). At the same time, the UN may also send in some helping hand and in no way do these two groups undergo particular competition between each other.  Perhaps, the only competition they have lies on the need of getting more volunteers and enticing more contributors for the development of the budget that they need to be able to fund further volunteering appointments.

Yes, in many ways, nonprofit organizations help the governments a lot in assuring that the society gets the services that they need and get a hold of the elemental factors that are essential for their survival. As for example educational organizations may provide the service but only for those who are able to pay for the service. However, there are also some educational organizations that are nonprofit which particularly provide plain service to the learners. Hence, in connection to this, it could be noticed that the management by which the operations of these organizations are being given particular attention tom also differ in form as education institutions that are for profit intend to hire teachers at a base pay approach, while nonprofit educational institutions are more indulged in the chance of getting instructors and educational guides both through volunteerism and others that are instantiated through the shifting levels of salary for the services that they are to provide. Practically, it could be observed that somehow, nonprofit organizations are practically accountable for providing the society what they deserve and what they need without actually asking for anything in return.

Comprehending About Internal and External Accountability

Separately, for profit organizations and nonprofit organizations have different roles and different responsibilities to the communities. At one point, the volunteerism that the nonprofit organizations depend upon makes it quite harder for them to complete operations in a much faster consideration that intends to make a difference in the society. Apparently only a few individuals today are making a good sense of what volunteerism is all about and how the process is actually able to make a great difference in the society. Only a few also realize the responsibility that they have on the others, giving them lesser chance to consider their purpose in life really is. Yes, volunteers are also accountable for the different operations of assistance that they are providing the community with. Particular process of operations ought to be followed and as volunteers following through these guidelines is practically essential in the role that they play for the communities. (Alvarado, 2000, 6)

Understandably though, for profit organizations also have a promised oath to keep good track on how they serve the needs of the people. Besides simply serving as an aide for completing the economic cycle that funds the society’s economic survival, business organizations are held responsible for assuring that their products are essentially kept practically usable and safe for the market that they are aiming to serve.

Surely, the separation of the internal and the external accountability of the nonprofit from that of the for profit groups of organizations define the separation of their role in the communities that they are operating with, Indeed, with this differences identified clearly, it could be admitted that both types of organizations take their own stand in making the society a better place to live in with the perfect balance that needs to be given particular attention to. Making a good sense of what their role is affects the development of the communities that they are working with. (Dubnick, 1998, 68) Certainly, with this assurance of completed role, both types of organization intend to make a big difference in the ways by which the needs and the demands of the people in a community are practically given helpful response.

Evaluation and Controls of Measuring and Assessing Organizational Governance

The process by which organizations are able to control their operations affects so much the services and the products that they provide for the community’s population. Definitely, it could be mentioned though that these operations need to be guided by particular protocols that are intended to assist the volunteers as well as that of the business organizers in becoming much able to complete the roles that they have signed up for.

How then shall the effectiveness of operations be assessed and measured? Through a series of evaluation that could be undergone within a specific span of time, operations of volunteerism and business approach for profit could be better investigated upon as to whether or not they are still able to adhere to the needs and the demands of the society who are supposed to be the receivers of their services and their products. (Dubnick, 1998, 81)


Considerably, from the discussion presented herein, the internal and the external accountability of organizations at present are practically making a good sense on how to develop the societies today. Surely, it could be mentioned that somehow, without the guidelines of completing these responsibilities, handling the most important roles that these organizations have towards the society may somewhat be much impossible to handle.

Believably, as carefully mandated by the sense of accountability itself, organizations today have ethical responsibilities to their own people and of course to the society. Assisting every member of the organization to handle this responsibility is an essential factor of group existence in the community. Being able to respond to the needs of the society is one thing but being able to respond in respect to their values is another. Certainly, these organizations are held practically responsible of being able to make a good sense of their existence through maintaining a proper reputation that is able to withstand the challenges of being an organization set forth to serve the concerns of the society,

For-profit organizations, although they have persona profit generating concerns, still have the responsibility of assuring that what they give the community is able to respond to the needs and values that the community itself gives particular importance to. Through making their employees and their staff of higher command accountable for their acts, they at the same time make every member of the organization responsible enough to make sure that the service they are giving to the organization would have a good effect on the community that they are aiming to serve.

Nonprofit organizations on the other hand are accountable for the chance of being able to serve the needs of the people without asking for any particular pay. This does not mean though that since the members are not paid, they are now able to deal with matters that way that they want to. As public servants who aim to do good, volunteers of nonprofit organizations are expected to be held responsible of their acts whether or not they are paid; their responsibility is to the people. Yes, with or without money entailed in connection with the process of completing one’s responsibility to the people, the process of being ethically outstanding in one’s process of operation is every organization’s best chance of gaining a fine reputation in the community.


Related essays